I
watched Before Midnight. While
this is watchable on its own before going through its prequels (Before Sunrise, Before Sunset), now I want to
go back and watch the other two once more. This has fast paced dialogues, lot
to think about. One particular part is below.
Jesse: So this is how you now want to be spending this evening? I
mean, this is what you wanna do tonight?
Céline: Well, you started it.
Jesse: No. You are the one who will not shut up about it. But if you
want to talk about it, I mean, really talk about it. I would prefer to have an
unemotional, rational conversation. I mean, do you think we can do that? Would
that be possible?
Céline: Here we go. Unemotional, rational. You always play the part of
the one and only rational one and I'm the irrational, hysterical, hormone-crazy
one because I have emotions. Yeah, you sit back and you speak from your big
perspective which means everything you say is level-headed and true.
Jesse: I don't always do anything.
Céline: The world is **ed by unemotional rational men deciding shit,
alright? Politicians going to war for no reason, corporate heads deciding to
wreck the environment, Cheney, Rumsfeld - very rational men.
Jesse: Cheney and Rumsfeld? Yeah, okay.
Céline: The final solution?
Very rational thinking behind it.
I
have used this argument in similar way like Jesse did (now I realize it may have
been just when it suited me) as well as it was given to me in reverse as well –
to be rational and not emotional. But is that just an excuse to ignore the
humane side of the issues, rather than going levels deeper into issues, ignore
the nuances and make a sweeping generalization – is rationalization a crutch for
that? Heart decides better in some situations than the brain. Or in other words
trusting intuition in some cases leads to better/faster decisions than the analytical
reasoning. Or what happens in cases where rational and cunning leaders stoke
the fires to get a mass to act on their raw emotions and ignore reason – that’s
even more devious. Better alternative is to balance? – cases where emotion,
intuition, gut and muscle memory guides decisions and it is ok vs cases that
need to weigh options, conduct analysis and research, get new knowledge and
then make a decision. Goes back to System 1 / System 2 of Daniel Kahneman. Best
not to use this theory in a heated domestic dispute anyway – emotions need to
be addressed.. 😊